web analytics
Brandware Public Relations | Atlanta | Los Angeles

Agency Spotter’s 2017 Trends Report Is A Must-Read For PR, Marketing And Creative Agencies

Agency Spotter released its 2017 Trends Report detailing the marketing services landscape for the year. It’s a great read for anyone in the creative, advertising, marketing or PR agency business.


You can download the full report, but here are some of the top highlights:

  • Brands are seeking to replace their Agency of Record every 2.8 years and brands have more AOR relationships than ever (think: advertising, PR, digital, mobile, social media, CRM, branding, experiential)
  • Meanwhile, more budget is shifting to project-based work
  • Year over year traffic on Agency Spotter is up from over 100 countries, indicating that more brands are searching for support worldwide
  • B2B decision makers are younger than ever, with 40% between the ages of 25-34
  • 81% of decision makers start their agency search online
  • Most decision makers do not reach out to agencies until they are 57% of the way through the decision making process

The report also includes great insights like the seasonal trends in agency searches.

For example, January through June, there are more searches for agencies who can deliver content marketing, PR, Search SEO/PPC, data analytics, shopper marketing, events marketing and healthcare marketing.

Whereas, July through December, there are more searches for e-commerce, branding, user experience design, email marketing, CRM automation,  motion video, graphic design, WOMM and animation.

The report is a terrific primer on what brands most need from agencies and how we should structure our services to deliver those solutions.

Image “weatherLayers_002” by Scott Brown via Flickr by CC 2.0 / Resized and cropped from original.

What if everything you ever learned about brand marketing was wrong?


By Dave Krysiek, President, Brandware Research

Here’s a distressing thought: New research might suggest that everything you ever learned about brand marketing was wrong.

Okay, saying everything you learned is invalid might be an exaggeration, but there are several recent studies coming to light that suggest the old brand identity model popularized by David Aaker several years ago just doesn’t work in most product categories. Yes, you read that right – new findings suggest that most of the advice first popularized in Aaker’s blockbuster book, Building Strong Brands, is fundamentally useless to marketing managers. Moreover, these same findings suggest that the wisdom of “The Aaker Model” didn’t simply fade with the rise of digital marketing, but that the model always failed to describe the way shoppers process information and select products or services.

Wow, talk about a generation of marketers getting the rug pulled out from under them!

The Aaker Model

Before we get into why the Aaker model is being challenged, let’s reexamine some of the brand marketing doctrines proposed by Aaker and his contemporaries. These well-meaning professionals declared that solid brand management starts with building a longstanding brand identity – a unique set of functional, emotional, and user associations that signify what the brand stands for and offers to buyers. And they argued that brand identity was instrumental in differentiating and making a brand attractive to a unique set of target customers.

Sounds entirely reasonable so far, right? And if you own an advertising agency, what could be better than to earn a pile of money by creating and promoting a “differentiated and powerful brand identity” that is expressly designed to bring notoriety and sales revenue to your client? The client is happy and the agency is happy – everybody wins!

Except that they don’t.

Unfortunately, there are several faulty assumptions implicit in The Aaker Model, and therein lies its weakness. The first of these assumptions is that most consumers buy using the classic “learn, feel, do” behavioral model. That is, they mentally seek out and process information which brands in a category are best for them, build affinity with particular brands using this new-found knowledge, and then purchase the brand that best fits their needs. The second assumption of the model is that customers seek an ongoing “relationship” with brands – that customers want to be emotionally connected to the brands they buy.  And the final assumption is that brands with strong identities ultimately succeed by building loyalty among targeted customers, whose bond with the brand keeps them coming back for more.

Recent Brand Findings

Although the common-sense assumptions that underlie The Aaker Model might initially ring true, peer-reviewed empirical findings from researchers like Andrew Ehrenberg, Gerald Goodhardt, Chris Chatfield, Byron Sharp, and Jenni Romaniuk, largely refute them.

In essence, the newer findings indicate that, in most categories, customers buy out of habit and engage in minimal mental processing when deciding which brands to buy: that is, they follow a “do, learn, feel” behavior that is quite the opposite from what Aaker and his contemporaries have suggested. The newer findings also show that a brand’s market share is most often driven by market penetration rates, not strong customer loyalty (i.e., attracting more customers is generally more effective than convincing current customers to purchase more often). Finally, the newer findings demonstrate that customers in most categories typically engage in choice-seeking behavior, rendering ineffective the targeting of particular market segments for many products and services.

These newer findings have profound implications for managers who are tasked with growing sales and revenue. For example, the findings strongly suggest that narrow brand positions are frequently too limiting and that the key to successful growth isn’t building customer loyalty, but capturing a greater number of light or occasional category buyers. And that implies the need to develop a more varied product line that is communicated to a broader target audience. It also suggests the necessity of making a brand available across a greater number of physical and online buying locations and making it more recognizable across a variety of category buying situations.

Implications for Research and Measurement

As one can imagine, the empirical findings mentioned above also affect the way in which many brands should be evaluated. In fact, in many product and service categories, these findings make obsolete the traditional “awareness and association” research regimen which, until recently, was considered the gold standard of brand measurement.

The specific measurement implications of these findings are too numerous to review here, so we summarized just five of them below:

  1. Don’t rely on data analytics alone. If the goal is to capture a greater number of customers who haven’t previously purchased a brand, then it’s fallacious reasoning to believe that simply modeling how the brand’s past customers were generated unlocks the secret to captured new customers. After all, if non-customers behaved similarly to customers, they’d already be buying the brand. Sorry, folks, but it’s far more effective to use traditional research to learn why non-customers haven’t purchased a brand, and then adjust marketing tactics accordingly.
  1. Initially research category buying behavior – not brand-specific behavior. Measures relating to the level of mental processing during the buying process, brand penetrations, purchase frequencies, and cross-purchasing behavior are especially illuminating. It’s shocking, but many marketing managers constantly track brand awareness, rarely giving a thought to systematically understanding how, when, why, with whom, how often, where, and under what situations and occasions category users buy.
  1. Identify and measure the pervasiveness of various category buying cues. This is a complicated task that typically involves a disciplined qualitative and quantitative research sequence, but these buying cues represent the “open windows” through which a brand can grow by capturing new customers. Managers need to understand which cues offer the most potential as well as the mind share captured by their brand for each one.
  1. Measure brand visibility. If the goal is to capture as many new buyers as possible, then marketing managers need to understand how many category buyers recognize their brand’s name, logo, colors, trade dress, package design, communications style, etc. Even brands with strong name recognition must be complemented with heavy-duty visibility and distinctiveness at the point of sale to grow revenue. Don’t believe us? Try finding your favorite item in a store after an ill-advised packaging refresh.
  1. Mind the overlaps. Most marketers already collect category data that pertains to past purchase behavior and buying information sources. They briefly look at the data and gravitate toward the most popular responses. However, the new empirical findings suggest that the real power of this information is derived from examining the overlap patterns between brands, purchase locations, or information sources. These analyses can reveal promising brand extension scenarios, the best distribution opportunities, and the most impactful media channels and properties.

There’s so much more to report on this important topic, but we’ll save that for another day. Meanwhile, if you’d like to learn more about why The Aaker Model is falling out of favor and what’s replacing it in the brand measurement world, please contact Brandware here.

Image “Edgethreesixty branding” by EdgeThreeSixty TM via Flickr by CC 2.0 / Resized and cropped from original.

Five Ways Consumers Behave Like Hummingbirds


Spring is here – at least for those of us in Atlanta, Georgia, and the Southeast – and all those blooms and pollen got me thinking about hummingbirds.

When Google announced its Hummingbird addition to the algorithm zoo back in 2013, the name seemed a nod to speed, that hallmark of hummingbird behavior. That particular update focused on semantic search, adding bonus ranking points for contextual content that provides fast, precise answers to actual consumer search questions.

While I have no real insight to the Google crew’s naming strategy, I like to think that whoever coined the name also thought about the similarities of that buzzy little bird’s behavior to how we browse and buy online today. Marketers spend a great deal of money trying to map out a consumer’s often erratic path to purchase, including bringing window-shoppers who’ve flitted away back through retargeting campaigns.

Today, trying to establish the most effective strategy for getting your message and call to action in front of a target consumer is more challenging than ever before. Should you spend your marketing dollars on search, video, PR, in-bound marketing, owned media, retargeting, native campaigns, social marketing or any of dozens of other options?

As you’re building marketing and communications strategy, it might serve well to keep these five hummingbird behaviors in mind – they’re not unlike how consumers gather.

  1. Multi-directional flight patterns. Hummingbirds can fly up, down, backwards, sideways – in short, they buzz around exactly like a consumer who follows threads, links, online referrals and other points of influence. You cannot hope to catch customers at every single point of engagement, but you can certainly map out their favorite feeding stops.
  2. Social isn’t everything. Hummingbirds, by nature, aren’t very social at all. In fact, they’re bitchy little birds and if you’ve ever put up a feeder you’ve heard them fight over it (tip: put up multiple feeders). Consumers may spend hours on social platforms picking up bits and pieces of information, but they’re flying solo when they get down to the business of buying. Yes, seed awareness building content across key social platforms, but don’t expect social marketing alone to fill your sales pipeline.
  3. Frequent feeding is a must. These little guys need to eat about every 10 minutes. For the digitally addicted, that amount of time between jumping online or Googling the next something may seem like an eternity, but it is certainly reflective of our need to ingest information virtually non-stop. As a marketer, make sure you regularly put out fresh morsels for your customers.
  4. Reward loyalty. Hummingbirds have awesome memories. So do consumers. Hummingbirds know the nectar replenishment cycle of every flower in their territory and also return to the same feeders year after year. Keep your customers coming back through exceptional service and rewards after the sale. Don’t forget to add “juice” to the feeder.
  5. Close, but no cigar. Have you ever had a fast stare-down with a hummingbird? Hummingbirds will get up close and personal to check you out as a potential food source, but if you have nothing of value to offer, they’re outta there. Fast. So, yes, whether its informative website copy or an enticing call to action, make sure you serve up value to target consumers.

Image “Hummingbird” by DC Gardens via Flickr by CC 2.0 / Resized and cropped from original.

3 Questions That Determine If You Need Crisis Communications Help


For businesses or organizations facing a communications crisis, there are just two outcomes – success or failure. And the failures seem to take on a life of their own, supported by insatiable conversation, usually involving all the wrong people. We’ve seen these communications failures time and time again: Sports franchises. Investment firms. Auto, food and CPG manufacturers. Restaurant chains.

Knowing what to do in a crisis means first identifying whether you’re really having one. That tops my list of questions you must answer before you do anything.

1. Am I really experiencing a public relations crisis?

A true communications crisis occurs when a signaling event surpasses the scale or capacity of an organization’s normal systems for response. Consider, for example, an unsavory social media conversation about your product or organization. If your public relations team is robust and the chatter is handled routinely, you’re likely not in crisis. Your systems are in place; your response is pre-planned and well tested. The issue you face is one your organization is accustomed to managing alone.

Now consider an explosion at your main manufacturing plant or the arrest of your CEO, either unfolding on live television – events that will trigger responses beyond yours. Investigations will ensue. Victims and their families of whatever went wrong will require answers. And the media will ask tough questions.

While extreme, these examples illustrate a crisis because you no longer own your story. The signaling event has surpassed the scale or capacity of your organization’s normal ability to respond.

2. Can I recover alone or do I need help to handle this?

If the issue has the potential to jeopardize your corporate identity or interrupt your business operations, chances are you and your organization are not prepared to handle the crisis alone.

Protecting an organization’s reputation means telling its story. Silence is not an option. Entering the conversation requires tremendous coordination and communication with shareholders, business partners, suppliers, employees, regulators, the media and, most importantly, your loyal customers.

In-house public relations teams are best at toeing the company line; that’s what they’re paid to do. Requiring paid personnel to step outside an established comfort zone to challenge norms is not a process meant for testing during crisis. Too often, in-house teams have learned to be careful, at least internally – an unhelpful practice when the stakes are as high.

This is not meant to be an indictment of corporate culture, but rather a reality check.

3. Can I rely on our existing crisis communications plan?

Whether your plan is enough to get you through depends on its strength.

  • Has your plan been exercised?
  • Do you know who will speak for your organization?
  • Can you reach them and will they know what to say?
  • Have your spokespeople been trained to speak with the media or citizen’s groups?
  • Is the issue you face a risk you were aware of?
  • Who should your organization be communicating with?
  • What will you say?
  • How will you break through?

It is here, in the face of these questions, where most organizations pause the planning process. The questions seem too daunting and too difficult to answer, so they aren’t. If this describes your plan – in the face of a crisis – you cannot rely upon your plan.

At Brandware, our Crisis Communications + Reputation Management practice can help you Identify, Prepare for and Respond to rapidly emerging events or issues with the potential to jeopardize your business reputation and interrupt operations.

Contact Brandware for more information or emergency counsel.

-Ryan Deal

Image “Stop Everything!” by tom_bullock via Flickr by CC 2.0 / Resized and cropped from original.

3 New Definitions for the “P” in PR


Social media stomped into the business world like an overgrown child and quickly moved from a high-chair to the big kids’ table. It’s a ravenous teen now, devouring huge chunks of energy, time and an ever-expanding portion of budget. Add shrinking editorial pages and staffs, and what’s a PR pro to do? Take advantage of evolving social policies and technologies and put them to work for your clients. Here’s what that means to the traditional “P” in public relations:

“P” is for Paid: Facebook recently announced a few updates to the search tool. Now, with a keyword or date, you can go back in time and find just about anything that you or your friends posted in the past. Remember that creepy picture from college your friend tagged you in years ago? It can now resurface through a simple search – endlessly scrolling month by month is a thing of the past. Here’s how to put it to work for your clients: your paid Facebook ad campaign can now easily target people who are talking or have talked about your desired topics. For example, a tire company could serve up ads to consumers who posted about a flat tire. Selling golf clubs? Find consumers complaining about their equipment. Here’s a good read on TechCrunch if you want more info on the subject.

“P” is for Privacy: While most companies will want to use this detailed material, it shouldn’t be at the expense of the customer. A lot of social media outlets are receiving pushback from the general population on their privacy settings and big data sales because they feel violated. Marketers and advertisers will need to solve the equation of how to use big data without offending the customer – drilling down into these demographics and customer behaviors to target ads should be a balance between tuned-in and turned-off. Make sure your customers know that your company’s intentions are noble and that you respect their right to privacy on the interweb.

“P” is for Pulse: Yes, recruiters love LinkedIn but it’s now so much more. The platform’s news/content aggregator has now been replaced by LinkedIn Pulse. Based on user preferences, LinkedIn Pulse serves news content, thought leadership articles and other relevant posts in one easy-to-digest format. LinkedIn Pulse is a great feature for clients who can elect one or two executives to submit content to Pulse, similar to how they would in a LinkedIn group. This update enables companies to reach a broader audience – and the best part? It’s free. If you aren’t taking advantage of this already, consider asking your PR pro or marketer about content marketing and how it can benefit your business.

These new features and policy changes are just the tip of the iceberg. Time to get a bigger tool box!

Image “101350_031“ by El Bibliomata via Flickr by CC 2.0 / Resized and cropped from original.

Page 1 of 512345
Featured Results

Porsche Cars North America >>

Connecting Porsche to the Next Generation of Enthusiasts

Recent Photos